H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 2-0
Felix Auger-Aliassime holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Felix Auger-Aliassime leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Felix Auger-Aliassime won the 2019 Sao Paulo third round 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2019* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |