H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 1-1
Felix Mantilla and Emilio Sanchez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1996 Prague fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1996* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1995* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |