H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Albert Montanes H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2012 Buenos Aires third round 7-5 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2012* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #263 7-5 1-0 (ret.) Albert Montanes #52 Match data
Feb 3, 2007* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Montanes #82 6-3 3-6 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #5 Match data
Feb 12, 2004* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #36 6-1 7-5 Albert Montanes #94 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #24 6-4 6-4 Albert Montanes #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6