H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Alex Corretja H2H: 0-1
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Kitzbuhel third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2000* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-1 6-2 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |