H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 1-1
Fernando Gonzalez and Alexandr Dolgopolov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on clay, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| May 27, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |