H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 0-1
Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2001 Vina Del Mar fourth round 6-0 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-0 5-7 7-5 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |