H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 1-1

Fernando Gonzalez and Ivan Navarro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Navarro leads 1–0 on clay, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2008 US Open first round 7-6(3) 6-3 4-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ivan Navarro
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Gonzalez #11 7-6(3) 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) Ivan Navarro #75 Match data Aug 27, 2008* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ivan Navarro #204 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #26 Match data Apr 9, 2005* QF Valencia ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,084 340 194 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Ivan Navarro #1,929 #67 1,108 1,626 35 65 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Ivan Navarro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,524 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,861 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,735 0 3 2004 0–1 0.0% #223 1,488 0 0
23 2004 34–21 61.8% #23 1,771 0 4 2005 3–1 75.0% #138 1,522 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,893 0 7 2006 2–7 22.2% #128 1,513 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,977 0 7 2007 10–12 45.5% #124 1,528 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 7–14 33.3% #74 1,525 0 0
27 2008 37–16 69.8% #15 1,895 0 10 2009 9–19 32.1% #127 1,562 0 0
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,994 0 11 2010 2–8 20.0% #193 1,573 0 0
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,851 0 11 2011 1–2 33.3% #191 1,520 0 0
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,810 0 11 2012 1–1 50.0% #231 1,573 0 0
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,781 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Ivan Navarro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 17 8 25 68.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 15 11 26 57.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 19 9 28 67.9% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 26 11 37 70.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 21 13 34 61.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2008 18 12 30 60.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 1 6 7 14.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2009 21 12 33 63.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 161 104 265 60.8% 142 67 209 67.9% 22 13 35 62.9% 15 10 25 60.0% — 5 20 25 20.0% 24 34 58 41.4% 6 11 17 35.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 501/534 of Fernando Gonzalez's and 98/100 of Ivan Navarro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Ivan Navarro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.5 11.0 59.2% 70.6% 52.1% 71.8% 50.0% 59.8% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 12/13 6.3 8.3 56.5% 73.6% 44.7% 50.2% 40.3% 60.9% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 14/15 4.9 7.2 59.0% 64.0% 44.3% 53.8% 34.5% 55.8% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 51/61 7.5 5.5 59.6% 75.9% 51.2% 66.3% 45.8% 66.0% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 54/56 7.3 5.1 59.8% 73.9% 51.4% 59.8% 50.9% 64.5% 37.3% 2004 1/1 8.0 14.0 46.2% 77.8% 38.1% 44.4% 0.0% 56.4% 26.9%
23 2004 49/55 6.3 3.8 59.7% 74.4% 51.0% 56.4% 37.5% 64.8% 37.0% 2005 4/4 5.5 3.8 59.6% 68.3% 54.8% 82.0% 45.1% 63.6% 39.1%
24 2005 66/67 7.4 4.3 58.7% 77.8% 54.4% 60.6% 40.8% 68.1% 37.4% 2006 9/9 6.7 2.8 55.6% 75.2% 43.9% 58.4% 40.5% 61.1% 31.6%
25 2006 66/67 6.3 3.4 63.3% 73.3% 52.5% 65.1% 40.2% 65.5% 37.6% 2007 20/22 7.6 2.8 63.3% 74.1% 53.9% 64.0% 34.9% 66.1% 35.1%
26 2007 51/54 6.6 2.5 63.6% 72.6% 52.5% 57.9% 43.9% 65.3% 37.0% 2008 21/21 7.4 3.1 61.3% 74.0% 52.0% 54.8% 38.9% 65.3% 33.1%
27 2008 45/53 6.2 3.1 62.4% 73.2% 54.3% 64.0% 43.8% 66.1% 36.9% 2009 28/28 6.8 3.6 60.8% 72.0% 47.2% 49.4% 34.7% 62.0% 32.5%
28 2009 55/55 8.3 2.9 63.6% 77.2% 53.8% 67.4% 42.5% 68.6% 36.6% 2010 10/10 6.6 2.5 63.9% 69.2% 49.4% 50.1% 27.0% 62.0% 29.2%
29 2010 22/22 8.2 4.2 59.2% 77.2% 49.4% 66.2% 44.8% 65.8% 35.0% 2011 3/3 4.7 3.0 61.7% 70.6% 53.4% 64.4% 38.9% 64.1% 30.5%
30 2011 7/7 7.4 2.1 55.4% 76.5% 56.2% 66.0% 22.7% 67.5% 33.1% 2012 2/2 1.0 3.0 57.0% 77.6% 37.6% 62.5% 62.5% 61.0% 36.9%
31 2012 7/7 4.9 2.0 61.2% 67.8% 48.5% 53.1% 32.0% 60.0% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 501/534 7.0 4.0 60.9% 74.6% 52.1% 61.9% 42.4% 65.7% 37.0% — 98/100 6.8 3.2 61.0% 72.8% 49.7% 56.4% 36.2% 63.5% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Ivan Navarro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1511 105.6 -1.67 -0.17 0.781 47.2% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1622 121.4 -1.12 +1.03 1.035 50.5% -12 -28 — 57.6% +0.52 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1524 97.3 -3.20 -2.78 0.764 45.2% +15 +53 — 39.0% -1.07 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.83 2002 1449 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1862 149.3 +3.57 +0.68 1.131 52.3% -55 -70 — 62.5% +0.77 10–9 (53%) 20–12 (63%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1736 139.9 +2.24 -0.64 1.051 51.0% -33 +148 — 55.8% +0.46 12–10 (55%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.01 2004 1488 101.6 -1.96 +0.96 0.618 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.16
23 2004 1772 149.3 +2.09 +0.53 1.050 50.5% -18 +128 -182 57.8% +0.27 10–7 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.95 2005 1523 107.0 -0.97 +1.54 1.075 50.7% — +31 — 60.0% +0.30 2–0 0–2 — 0.00
24 2005 1893 150.4 +5.23 +1.17 1.172 52.6% -23 +18 -165 64.7% +0.84 11–10 (52%) 18–11 (62%) — +1.02 2006 1513 115.3 -0.23 -1.14 0.813 46.8% -74 +66 — 33.3% -1.10 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.81
25 2006 1977 157.7 +3.14 +1.75 1.089 51.5% -6 -25 -185 62.1% +0.57 17–9 (65%) 16–11 (59%) — +0.01 2007 1529 120.9 +1.34 -1.48 1.036 50.5% -91 +106 — 46.0% -0.32 0–2 7–5 (58%) — +0.79
26 2007 1869 157.8 +2.59 +1.12 1.065 51.0% +61 +45 -58 57.0% +0.42 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.42 2008 1525 120.7 +1.00 -2.88 0.954 49.3% -126 +129 0 33.3% -0.54 3–3 (50%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.30
27 2008 1895 145.8 +2.46 +0.17 1.089 51.3% -20 +167 -83 63.6% +0.70 11–5 (69%) 19–11 (63%) — +1.26 2009 1563 119.4 -1.40 -2.31 0.857 47.4% -118 +12 -4 38.9% -0.93 2–9 (18%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.51
28 2009 1994 164.5 +5.52 +1.03 1.165 52.4% -28 +162 -147 67.4% +0.98 8–5 (62%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.25 2010 1574 113.7 -0.55 -4.48 0.768 46.0% — +43 -45 23.8% -1.43 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.10
29 2010 1852 136.5 +1.61 -1.28 1.024 50.6% +68 +161 — 57.1% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.97 2011 1521 110.1 +1.15 -2.01 0.848 48.5% — +76 — 37.5% +0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.30
30 2011 1811 116.1 +0.06 -0.31 1.016 50.2% — — +69 42.1% -0.21 — 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 2012 1573 112.6 -0.10 -0.01 0.944 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — -0.01
31 2012 1782 121.2 -1.27 -2.78 0.828 47.7% — +179 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2085 154.5 +2.93 +0.53 1.078 51.3% -11 +73 -114 60.0% +0.53 102–74 (58%) 132–95 (58%) 106.0 +1.22 — 1626 119.0 -0.02 -2.13 0.904 48.4% -108 +67 -12 38.0% -0.71 8–19 (30%) 19–28 (40%) 93.9 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.