H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-2

Fernando Gonzalez and Jurgen Melzer are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Rome Masters fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 1, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #13 3-6 6-3 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
May 18, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #5 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #35 Match data
Jul 31, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #61 6-3 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #19 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jurgen Melzer #100 6-3 6-4 7-6(6) Fernando Gonzalez #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5