H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 1-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2002 US Open second round 7-6(5) 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(5) 6-4 7-6(3) | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Kenneth Carlsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 |