H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 4-0

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 4–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Vina Del Mar semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 7, 2009* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #18 6-3 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #171 Match data
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #25 6-3 6-3 6-1 Pablo Cuevas #113 Match data
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #18 6-3 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #96 Match data
Feb 2, 2008* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #24 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6