H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 2-0
Fernando Meligeni holds a 2–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2002 Palermo third round 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2002* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2001* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-5 7-6(5) | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |