H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Bobby Reynolds H2H: 3-0

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–0 lead over Bobby Reynolds in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2008 Beijing third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Bobby Reynolds
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2008* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #15 6-3 6-3 Bobby Reynolds #84 Match data
Jun 20, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Fernando Verdasco #21 6-2 6-3 Bobby Reynolds #106 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Fernando Verdasco #41 6-4 6-4 6-3 Bobby Reynolds #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Bobby Reynolds #1,116 #63 1,146 1,781 28 72 28.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Bobby Reynolds
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2003 0–2 0.0% #475 1,457 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #288 1,439 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2005 5–8 38.5% #92 1,524 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2006 1–11 8.3% #190 1,410 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2007 0–3 0.0% #111 1,503 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2008 13–18 41.9% #70 1,649 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2009 3–13 18.8% #332 1,611 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2010 0–2 0.0% #163 1,580 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2011 0–3 0.0% #127 1,561 0 0
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2012 4–7 36.4% #148 1,664 0 0
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2013 2–4 33.3% #179 1,734 0 0
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —