H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-3

Jeremy Chardy holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2018 Paris Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 2018* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #27 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #40 Match data
Aug 14, 2018* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #46 6-1 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Mar 26, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #65 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #31 Match data
Aug 12, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #72 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Feb 18, 2010* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #41 7-6(4) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —