H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Valencia third round 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 7-6(1) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fernando Verdasco | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |