H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 4-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–2 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2022 Estoril fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2022* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #118 6-2 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #107 Match data
Apr 17, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #37 5-7 7-6(4) 6-1 Pablo Cuevas #41 Match data
Jun 3, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #37 6-2 6-1 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #23 Match data
Jul 12, 2014* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Pablo Cuevas #111 7-6(6) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #29 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #25 4-6 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #136 Match data
Feb 1, 2008* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 R16 Clay Pablo Cuevas #111 7-5 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —