H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 0-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Umag third round 5-7 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2006* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |