H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Filip Krajinovic vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 1-0
Filip Krajinovic holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Londero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2021 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2021* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Filip Krajinovic | 6-0 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Filip Krajinovic | 7-5 6-2 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Krajinovic | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |