H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Filip Krajinovic vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 1-1
Filip Krajinovic and Peter Gojowczyk are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Metz third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Filip Krajinovic | 7-5 6-4 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2018* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-4 6-1 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2015* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | Q3 | Grass | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-2 6-4 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Krajinovic | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |