H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Filip Krajinovic vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Filip Krajinovic holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2018 Dubai third round 0-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2018* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Filip Krajinovic | 0-6 6-2 6-2 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2013* | Marseille | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Filip Krajinovic | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Krajinovic | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |