H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Filippo Volandri vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 0-1
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2005 Moscow fourth round 6-1 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-1 7-6(6) | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filippo Volandri | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |