H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Filippo Volandri vs Mate Pavic H2H: 1-0
Filippo Volandri holds a 1–0 lead over Mate Pavic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filippo Volandri leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filippo Volandri won the 2011 Umag third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 33
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2011* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Filippo Volandri | 6-4 6-0 | Mate Pavic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mate Pavic | #974 | #295 | 150 | 1,611 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filippo Volandri | Mate Pavic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #369 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #638 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #933 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |