H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Filippo Volandri vs Nathan Healey H2H: 0-1
Nathan Healey holds a 1–0 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathan Healey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathan Healey won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nathan Healey | 6-2 6-3 (ret.) | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nathan Healey | #1,134 | #159 | 268 | 1,579 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filippo Volandri | Nathan Healey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #241 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |