H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Florent Serra vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-2
Marc Gicquel holds a 2–1 lead over Florent Serra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Florent Serra won the 2009 Zagreb third round 6-2 4-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2013* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Florent Serra | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2009* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Florent Serra | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2007* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 7-6(0) | Florent Serra | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2006* | Metz | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 7-5 | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florent Serra | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |