H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Florent Serra vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0

Florent Serra holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florent Serra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florent Serra won the 2009 New Haven round of 16 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florent Serra
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florent Serra #60 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Rajeev Ram #117 Match data Aug 27, 2009* R16 New Haven ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florent Serra #942 #36 1,371 1,811 123 170 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florent Serra Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2003 0–2 0.0% #218 1,467 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2004 2–3 40.0% #213 1,553 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2005 10–10 50.0% #49 1,653 0 1 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2006 23–26 46.9% #60 1,669 0 2 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2007 16–24 40.0% #92 1,621 0 2 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2008 20–24 45.5% #59 1,690 0 2 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2009 24–29 45.3% #65 1,710 0 2 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2010 19–27 41.3% #69 1,694 0 2 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2011 4–12 25.0% #171 1,633 0 2 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2012 5–8 38.5% #118 1,692 0 2 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2013 0–4 0.0% #218 1,664 0 2 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2014 0–1 0.0% #346 1,601 0 2 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florent Serra Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 12 10 22 54.5% 8 11 19 42.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2007 10 11 21 47.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2008 10 15 25 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 14 16 30 46.7% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 65 91 156 41.7% 48 56 104 46.2% 9 17 26 34.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 292/293 of Florent Serra's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Florent Serra Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2003 2/2 3.0 2.0 68.7% 62.7% 47.8% 61.7% 87.5% 57.5% 29.2% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2004 5/5 2.2 3.6 68.6% 68.4% 36.9% 39.9% 34.8% 58.6% 44.2% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2005 20/20 3.0 2.1 58.7% 65.3% 52.3% 44.5% 47.6% 59.8% 41.2% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2006 49/49 3.3 2.3 59.1% 65.9% 50.4% 56.2% 45.3% 59.6% 38.0% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2007 39/40 4.7 2.1 62.6% 69.6% 51.2% 64.0% 37.1% 63.0% 32.9% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2008 44/44 2.8 1.6 63.6% 66.6% 50.5% 53.8% 36.4% 60.6% 37.2% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2009 53/53 4.1 2.2 61.3% 68.2% 50.7% 59.0% 42.1% 61.5% 35.8% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2010 46/46 4.8 1.9 61.0% 66.2% 51.5% 61.3% 42.1% 60.3% 35.7% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2011 16/16 3.4 1.9 61.6% 67.5% 45.1% 51.6% 35.9% 58.7% 30.8% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2012 13/13 4.0 2.7 58.8% 64.1% 47.7% 53.1% 43.1% 57.3% 36.5% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2013 4/4 3.5 1.3 58.3% 66.5% 44.9% 50.7% 30.0% 57.4% 30.6% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2014 1/1 2.0 0.0 63.0% 55.2% 41.2% 42.9% — 50.0% 27.1% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 292/293 3.8 2.0 61.3% 66.9% 50.1% 56.6% 41.1% 60.4% 36.1% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florent Serra Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2001 1481 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2002 1452 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2003 1468 102.2 -3.05 -0.03 0.687 46.0% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2004 1554 110.6 -0.04 +0.80 1.068 51.0% — +17 — 42.9% +0.14 1–1 0–2 — -0.14 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2005 1653 128.7 -1.73 +2.50 1.023 50.3% -88 +19 — 47.2% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.02 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2006 1669 137.1 -1.41 +1.08 0.941 49.2% -17 -11 -70 46.8% -0.31 9–11 (45%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.88 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2007 1622 125.2 -0.74 -2.78 0.888 48.5% +16 -25 -57 42.3% -0.42 11–6 (65%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.32 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2008 1691 130.4 -1.64 +0.65 0.947 49.0% -16 -10 -125 44.3% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 16–8 (67%) — +0.87 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2009 1711 138.9 -1.54 -0.30 0.930 49.0% -16 -35 -165 44.5% -0.37 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.27 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2010 1695 142.7 -1.33 -0.81 0.899 48.3% -7 +12 -156 43.8% -0.33 8–8 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.81 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2011 1634 117.1 -2.98 -3.39 0.747 45.3% -14 +77 — 21.6% -1.81 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2012 1693 122.8 -3.34 +0.02 0.854 47.8% -58 — — 25.8% -1.42 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.48 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 2013 1665 120.4 -2.03 -1.38 0.718 44.2% +30 — — 9.1% -2.36 — 1–1 — -0.35 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 2014 1601 107.7 +0.76 -0.36 0.542 38.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.18 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 2015 1595 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1812 133.6 -1.55 -0.29 0.913 48.6% -16 -6 -107 41.8% -0.50 51–49 (51%) 61–73 (46%) 100.5 -2.30 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.