H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Florent Serra vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-1
Florent Serra holds a 2–1 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florent Serra leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Florent Serra won the 2012 Australian Open first round 6-7(3) 3-6 5-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Florent Serra | 6-7(3) 3-6 5-4 (ret.) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2009* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Florent Serra | 6-3 6-3 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2008* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Steve Darcis | 7-5 6-3 | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florent Serra | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |