H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Florian Mayer vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Florian Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florian Mayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florian Mayer won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Florian Mayer | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florian Mayer | #256 | #18 | 1,735 | 1,955 | 227 | 250 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florian Mayer | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #72 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #56 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #55 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #409 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #28 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,887 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #217 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #256 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |