H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Florian Mayer vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-4

Jeremy Chardy holds a 4–0 lead over Florian Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2017 Stuttgart Open first round 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florian Mayer
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #80 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1) Florian Mayer #51 Match data Jun 15, 2017* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass
Jeremy Chardy #36 4-6 7-5 6-3 Florian Mayer #43 Match data Oct 24, 2013* R32 Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #64 6-3 6-1 Florian Mayer #20 Match data Apr 13, 2012* R16 Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #58 6-2 7-6(4) Florian Mayer #45 Match data Aug 17, 2010* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florian Mayer #256 #18 1,735 1,956 227 251 47.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florian Mayer Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2004 19–17 52.8% #35 1,724 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2005 20–24 45.5% #72 1,723 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2006 24–21 53.3% #56 1,719 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2007 17–23 42.5% #55 1,618 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2008 2–9 18.2% #409 1,537 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2009 3–6 33.3% #61 1,666 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2010 21–19 52.5% #37 1,801 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2011 42–24 63.6% #23 1,940 0 1 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2012 19–24 44.2% #28 1,798 0 1 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2013 27–25 51.9% #40 1,861 0 1 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2014 7–7 50.0% #147 1,888 0 1 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2015 4–9 30.8% #217 1,790 0 1 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2016 10–11 47.6% #50 1,811 0 2 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2017 10–17 37.0% #69 1,760 0 2 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2018 2–15 11.8% #256 1,594 0 2 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florian Mayer Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2008 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2011 23 15 38 60.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2012 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 13 15 28 46.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
32 2016 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 99 131 230 43.0% 86 90 176 48.9% 39 26 65 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/478 of Florian Mayer's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Florian Mayer Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2004 35/36 4.6 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 52.0% 58.7% 40.5% 62.2% 38.3% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2005 44/44 3.5 2.0 61.7% 67.4% 46.5% 53.8% 43.3% 59.4% 36.3% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2006 45/45 4.5 1.7 61.9% 72.5% 51.2% 52.6% 45.0% 64.2% 40.6% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2007 40/40 4.6 1.8 61.8% 68.4% 49.5% 47.5% 40.6% 61.2% 37.3% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2008 11/11 2.5 1.5 61.1% 63.4% 45.6% 47.0% 45.2% 56.5% 35.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2009 9/9 3.4 1.4 64.7% 67.8% 52.8% 50.1% 29.9% 62.7% 37.1% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2010 39/40 4.3 1.7 63.6% 71.3% 53.1% 64.5% 39.5% 64.4% 37.1% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2011 66/66 3.7 2.0 59.8% 71.3% 52.7% 58.4% 47.5% 63.6% 39.3% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2012 42/43 4.2 1.3 61.0% 70.9% 53.0% 57.4% 41.7% 63.7% 34.8% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2013 52/52 4.4 1.7 63.1% 68.4% 51.5% 55.8% 41.8% 62.2% 37.0% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2014 13/14 6.0 1.4 62.6% 66.6% 52.3% 60.8% 49.8% 61.3% 38.3% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2015 13/13 5.1 1.5 64.0% 64.3% 47.6% 58.8% 43.2% 58.3% 33.9% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2016 20/21 4.6 1.5 63.3% 71.2% 49.8% 53.8% 41.2% 63.3% 34.1% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2017 27/27 4.2 1.7 61.4% 69.6% 51.3% 61.8% 42.9% 62.5% 32.4% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2018 17/17 3.6 2.1 59.2% 65.5% 48.4% 59.0% 36.4% 58.5% 33.5% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 473/478 4.2 1.8 61.7% 69.4% 50.9% 56.3% 42.6% 62.2% 36.9% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florian Mayer Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2004 1725 137.2 +0.54 +1.23 1.014 50.1% -126 -13 -31 53.9% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2005 1724 137.0 -2.41 -0.72 0.893 48.1% -85 +5 +29 43.8% -0.60 7–3 (70%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.13 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2006 1720 136.8 +1.98 +2.41 1.131 52.0% -75 +52 +39 52.3% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.24 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2007 1619 134.0 -0.59 +0.75 0.962 49.0% +27 +49 +119 43.4% -0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2008 1538 114.4 -3.82 -1.01 0.823 46.3% +41 — — 22.7% -1.23 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.13 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2009 1667 132.6 -0.44 -0.02 0.994 49.6% +28 — — 39.1% -0.30 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.01 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2010 1801 152.2 +1.23 +0.62 1.044 50.8% -13 -82 +3 53.6% +0.29 8–5 (62%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.46 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 2011 1941 154.2 +1.16 +2.09 1.081 51.2% -21 -47 -127 59.2% +0.39 9–4 (69%) 13–6 (68%) — +1.25 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 2012 1799 150.3 +0.84 -1.03 0.960 49.3% -6 -9 +188 48.5% -0.12 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.65 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 2013 1861 153.3 -0.17 +0.37 0.978 49.6% -38 -39 +104 49.2% -0.08 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.13 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 2014 1889 146.1 -0.12 +1.13 0.988 49.5% -31 — — 56.8% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.70 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 2015 1790 121.4 -3.24 -0.95 0.812 46.4% — -41 +139 37.5% -1.09 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.28 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 2016 1811 135.4 -0.43 -0.48 0.929 48.7% -17 -148 +181 40.4% -0.47 3–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.04 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 2017 1760 136.7 -0.19 -1.94 0.865 48.0% -94 -20 +178 35.6% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–11 (8%) — -0.36 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2018 1594 122.8 -3.14 -1.85 0.807 46.1% +12 +22 +258 20.9% -1.54 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1956 149.9 -0.06 +0.39 0.978 49.5% -29 -15 +102 47.6% -0.15 61–52 (54%) 71–87 (45%) 100.8 -1.05 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.