H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Florian Mayer vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Florian Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florian Mayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florian Mayer won the 2014 Doha third round 6-2 3-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2014* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Florian Mayer | 6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florian Mayer | #256 | #18 | 1,735 | 1,955 | 227 | 250 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Florian Mayer | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #72 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #56 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #55 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #409 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #28 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,887 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #217 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #256 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |