H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Florian Mayer vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-1
Florian Mayer and Milos Raonic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florian Mayer leads 1–0 on clay, while Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Beijing third round 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2016* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 7-6(1) | Florian Mayer | Match data |
| May 15, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Florian Mayer | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florian Mayer | #256 | #18 | 1,735 | 1,955 | 227 | 250 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florian Mayer | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #72 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #56 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #55 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #409 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2011 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2012 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #28 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2014 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,887 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2015 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #217 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2017 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2018 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #256 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |