H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Frances Tiafoe vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-1

Frances Tiafoe and Jeremy Chardy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass, while Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2019 Winston-Salem Open second round 4-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frances Tiafoe
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frances Tiafoe #52 4-2 (ret.) Jeremy Chardy #74 Match data Aug 21, 2019* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #61 6-4 6-4 Frances Tiafoe #62 Match data Jun 23, 2018* QF Queen's Club Championships ATP 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Tiafoe #12 #10 3,130 2,015 263 215 55.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frances Tiafoe Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 1–5 16.7% #176 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 1–6 14.3% #108 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 7–17 29.2% #79 1,706 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2018 27–22 55.1% #39 1,818 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2019 21–25 45.7% #47 1,800 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2020 9–11 45.0% #59 1,815 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2021 32–24 57.1% #38 1,927 0 1 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2022 34–23 59.6% #19 1,979 0 1 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2023 34–19 64.2% #16 1,896 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2024 32–25 56.1% #18 1,898 0 3 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2025 26–21 55.3% #30 1,814 0 3 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2026 39–16 70.9% #12 1,980 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frances Tiafoe Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 17 15 32 53.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2021 25 16 41 61.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2023 19 13 32 59.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2024 24 17 41 58.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2025 14 12 26 53.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2026 23 10 33 69.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 178 145 323 55.1% 52 48 100 52.0% 33 22 55 60.0% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 476/480 of Frances Tiafoe's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frances Tiafoe Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 2.0 6.0 54.9% 74.4% 40.6% 75.0% 33.3% 59.2% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 6/6 9.0 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 48.9% 60.8% 21.2% 62.2% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 7/7 5.7 2.6 64.1% 67.8% 52.2% 49.8% 35.1% 62.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 24/24 8.1 3.1 58.9% 70.8% 52.8% 50.2% 39.0% 63.2% 34.2% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2018 49/49 7.8 3.0 61.0% 72.9% 52.9% 61.8% 40.6% 65.0% 35.2% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2019 46/46 6.0 2.4 65.4% 70.9% 50.9% 53.2% 39.8% 64.2% 35.5% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2020 20/20 4.6 2.1 63.1% 69.7% 50.0% 59.7% 43.0% 62.4% 37.0% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2021 54/56 7.1 2.5 61.0% 72.0% 53.5% 60.2% 40.5% 64.9% 36.6% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2022 57/57 8.5 2.4 58.0% 73.6% 52.9% 66.2% 40.3% 64.9% 35.6% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2023 53/53 8.3 2.3 60.0% 77.0% 52.9% 62.6% 43.2% 67.4% 35.9% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2024 57/57 8.5 2.5 59.2% 74.6% 54.1% 62.6% 38.0% 66.1% 35.1% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2025 47/47 8.2 2.7 56.1% 74.5% 52.0% 56.9% 41.1% 64.5% 37.3% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2026 55/57 6.5 2.3 61.1% 74.2% 54.4% 61.7% 41.4% 66.3% 36.1% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 476/480 7.5 2.5 60.3% 73.3% 52.8% 60.2% 40.3% 65.1% 35.7% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frances Tiafoe Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1469 99.7 -1.83 -1.00 0.700 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1488 112.1 -2.26 -2.21 0.806 46.2% +2 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1508 116.9 -1.57 +0.56 0.914 48.1% -4 — — 30.0% -0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 98.5 0.00 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1706 146.8 -0.17 -0.03 0.930 48.7% +4 — -121 38.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 2–11 (15%) 92.8 -1.15 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2018 1818 149.3 +0.75 +0.31 1.007 50.2% -22 -216 -116 51.6% +0.02 11–7 (61%) 14–11 (56%) 108.6 -1.15 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2019 1801 153.7 +0.57 +0.02 0.990 49.7% +31 -161 -153 48.4% -0.29 6–16 (27%) 14–10 (58%) 94.8 -0.49 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2020 1815 147.6 -0.28 -0.04 0.984 49.6% +51 — — 50.0% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 7–5 (58%) 98.5 -1.03 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2021 1928 156.0 +2.07 +0.36 1.042 50.8% +30 -311 -225 56.4% +0.34 11–11 (50%) 18–17 (51%) 101.4 -0.63 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2022 1979 154.0 +1.43 +0.08 1.012 50.3% +23 -267 -209 58.6% +0.17 12–11 (52%) 28–14 (67%) 106.5 +1.05 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2023 1897 150.5 +2.85 +0.22 1.098 51.3% +6 -77 -40 62.2% +0.70 6–5 (55%) 19–13 (59%) 101.5 +2.33 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2024 1899 146.6 +1.42 +0.07 1.034 50.5% +7 -144 -43 52.7% +0.10 11–9 (55%) 20–18 (53%) 98.7 +3.04 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2025 1815 142.8 +0.01 +0.86 1.051 50.7% +15 -1 -11 57.5% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 15–7 (68%) 97.0 +3.26 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2026 1981 151.7 +1.33 +1.12 1.068 51.1% +2 -135 -77 62.1% +0.69 16–6 (73%) 16–16 (50%) 104.9 +1.48 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2016 155.1 +1.10 +0.31 1.024 50.4% +13 -150 -109 54.2% +0.15 85–94 (47%) 157–129 (55%) 101.8 +1.38 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.