H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Frances Tiafoe vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-2

Matthew Ebden holds a 2–1 lead over Frances Tiafoe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Shanghai Masters first round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frances Tiafoe
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthew Ebden #51 3-6 6-4 6-3 Frances Tiafoe #40 Match data Oct 9, 2018* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Frances Tiafoe #91 6-2 2-6 6-2 Matthew Ebden #88 Match data Feb 22, 2018* R32 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Matthew Ebden #76 6-3 6-2 Frances Tiafoe #79 Match data Jan 3, 2018* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Tiafoe #12 #10 3,130 2,015 262 215 54.9% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frances Tiafoe Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 1–5 16.7% #176 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 1–6 14.3% #108 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 7–17 29.2% #79 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 27–22 55.1% #39 1,818 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2019 21–25 45.7% #47 1,800 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2020 9–11 45.0% #59 1,815 0 1 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2021 32–24 57.1% #38 1,927 0 1 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2022 34–23 59.6% #19 1,979 0 1 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2023 34–19 64.2% #16 1,896 0 3 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2024 32–25 56.1% #18 1,898 0 3 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2025 26–21 55.3% #30 1,814 0 3 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2026 38–16 70.4% #12 1,974 0 4 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frances Tiafoe Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 17 15 32 53.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2021 25 16 41 61.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2023 19 13 32 59.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2024 24 17 41 58.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2025 14 12 26 53.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 22 10 32 68.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 177 145 322 55.0% 52 48 100 52.0% 33 22 55 60.0% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 475/479 of Frances Tiafoe's and 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frances Tiafoe Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 2.0 6.0 54.9% 74.4% 40.6% 75.0% 33.3% 59.2% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 6/6 9.0 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 48.9% 60.8% 21.2% 62.2% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 7/7 5.7 2.6 64.1% 67.8% 52.2% 49.8% 35.1% 62.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 24/24 8.1 3.1 58.9% 70.8% 52.8% 50.2% 39.0% 63.2% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 49/49 7.8 3.0 61.0% 72.9% 52.9% 61.8% 40.6% 65.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 46/46 6.0 2.4 65.4% 70.9% 50.9% 53.2% 39.8% 64.2% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 20/20 4.6 2.1 63.1% 69.7% 50.0% 59.7% 43.0% 62.4% 37.0% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2021 54/56 7.1 2.5 61.0% 72.0% 53.5% 60.2% 40.5% 64.9% 36.6% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2022 57/57 8.5 2.4 58.0% 73.6% 52.9% 66.2% 40.3% 64.9% 35.6% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2023 53/53 8.3 2.3 60.0% 77.0% 52.9% 62.6% 43.2% 67.4% 35.9% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2024 57/57 8.5 2.5 59.2% 74.6% 54.1% 62.6% 38.0% 66.1% 35.1% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2025 47/47 8.2 2.7 56.1% 74.5% 52.0% 56.9% 41.1% 64.5% 37.3% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2026 54/56 6.5 2.3 61.1% 74.2% 54.3% 61.7% 41.4% 66.3% 36.0% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
Career — 475/479 7.5 2.5 60.3% 73.3% 52.8% 60.2% 40.3% 65.1% 35.7% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frances Tiafoe Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1469 99.7 -1.83 -1.00 0.700 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1488 112.1 -2.26 -2.21 0.806 46.2% +2 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1508 116.9 -1.57 +0.56 0.914 48.1% -4 — — 30.0% -0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1706 146.8 -0.17 -0.03 0.930 48.7% +4 — -121 38.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 2–11 (15%) — -1.15 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1818 149.3 +0.75 +0.31 1.007 50.2% -22 -216 -116 51.6% +0.02 11–7 (61%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.15 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1801 153.7 +0.57 +0.02 0.990 49.7% +31 -161 -153 48.4% -0.29 6–16 (27%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.49 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1815 147.6 -0.28 -0.04 0.984 49.6% +51 — — 50.0% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.03 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2021 1928 156.0 +2.07 +0.36 1.042 50.8% +30 -311 -225 56.4% +0.34 11–11 (50%) 18–17 (51%) — -0.63 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2022 1979 154.0 +1.43 +0.08 1.012 50.3% +23 -267 -209 58.6% +0.17 12–11 (52%) 28–14 (67%) — +1.05 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2023 1897 150.5 +2.85 +0.22 1.098 51.3% +6 -77 -40 62.2% +0.70 6–5 (55%) 19–13 (59%) — +2.33 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2024 1899 146.6 +1.42 +0.07 1.034 50.5% +7 -144 -43 52.7% +0.10 11–9 (55%) 20–18 (53%) — +3.04 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2025 1815 142.8 +0.01 +0.86 1.051 50.7% +15 -1 -11 57.5% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 15–7 (68%) — +3.26 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2026 1975 151.8 +1.35 +1.11 1.069 51.1% 0 -129 -72 61.3% +0.66 16–6 (73%) 15–16 (48%) — +1.33 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 2016 155.1 +1.11 +0.30 1.024 50.4% +13 -149 -108 54.1% +0.15 85–94 (47%) 156–129 (55%) 101.7 +1.35 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.