H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-2
Matthew Ebden holds a 2–1 lead over Frances Tiafoe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Shanghai Masters second round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Frances Tiafoe | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2018* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Frances Tiafoe | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2018* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-3 6-2 | Frances Tiafoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |