H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Ruben Bemelmans
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frances Tiafoe vs Ruben Bemelmans.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |