H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Aaron Krickstein H2H: 1-2
Aaron Krickstein holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Aaron Krickstein leads 1–0 on carpet, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-2 6-0 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1995* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Aaron Krickstein | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Aaron Krickstein | 6-4 6-4 6-7(0) 7-6(4) | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Aaron Krickstein | #1,299 | #6 | 1,544 | 2,043 | 381 | 252 | 60.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Aaron Krickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #93 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,865 | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,879 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,006 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #28 | 1,825 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #45 | 1,786 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1092 | 1,534 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |