H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Albert Costa H2H: 2-3

Albert Costa holds a 3–2 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2001 Hamburg Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Costa #53 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #38 Match data
Jul 28, 2000* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #51 4-6 6-3 6-2 Albert Costa #18 Match data
May 13, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Albert Costa #21 6-3 6-2 Francisco Clavet #63 Match data
May 31, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #43 6-4 6-3 4-6 7-6(6) Albert Costa #13 Match data
Apr 21, 1995* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Costa #43 6-3 6-1 Francisco Clavet #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —