H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-0
Francisco Clavet holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2001 Miami Masters second round 6-0 6-7(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-0 6-7(6) 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2000* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |