H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-2

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Francisco Clavet #37 6-1 6-4 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #512 Match data
May 17, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #45 2-6 7-5 6-2 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
Jul 22, 1993* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #30 7-6(5) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —