H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-0
Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1991 Stuttgart Outdoor fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1991* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-3 6-3 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |