H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Boris Becker H2H: 0-2

Boris Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1996 Antwerp quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Boris Becker
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 1996* Antwerp ATP 250 QF Carpet Boris Becker #4 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #51 Match data
Jun 5, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Boris Becker #2 7-6(6) 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Boris Becker #257 #1 4,297 2,266 670 219 75.4% 6 9 4 0 30 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Boris Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1984 11–11 50.0% #66 1,651 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 50–18 73.5% #6 2,066 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1986 65–13 83.3% #2 2,229 2 9
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1987 50–15 76.9% #5 2,040 2 12
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1988 50–9 84.7% #4 2,180 2 19
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1989 54–8 87.1% #2 2,232 4 24
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1990 69–14 83.1% #2 2,206 4 29
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1991 46–13 78.0% #3 2,112 5 31
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1992 48–15 76.2% #5 2,145 5 36
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1993 42–22 65.6% #11 1,885 5 38
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1994 50–17 74.6% #3 2,052 5 42
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1995 51–18 73.9% #4 2,043 5 44
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1996 42–14 75.0% #6 2,083 6 49
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1997 17–13 56.7% #62 1,914 6 49
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1998 15–11 57.7% #69 1,874 6 49
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1999 10–7 58.8% #131 1,863 6 49
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —