H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Cassio Motta H2H: 1-1

Francisco Clavet and Cassio Motta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on clay, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1991 Sao Paulo round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Cassio Motta
BRA Age 66 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #37 6-2 6-2 Cassio Motta #244 Match data Nov 8, 1991* R16 Sao Paulo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cassio Motta #127 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #84 Match data Aug 1, 1990* R64 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Cassio Motta #576 #48 352 1,739 105 164 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Cassio Motta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 1979 4–8 33.3% #109 1,485 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1980 0–7 0.0% #255 1,439 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,451 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1982 8–13 38.1% #86 1,540 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1983 14–21 40.0% #79 1,678 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1984 12–19 38.7% #107 1,617 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1985 7–11 38.9% #136 1,626 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1986 10–10 50.0% #49 1,667 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1987 12–17 41.4% #122 1,628 0 0
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 1988 7–9 43.8% #74 1,593 0 0
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 1989 13–16 44.8% #134 1,559 0 0
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 1990 10–16 38.5% #105 1,538 0 0
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1991 2–8 20.0% #216 1,475 0 0
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1992 5–5 50.0% #198 1,532 0 0
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 1993 0–1 0.0% #693 1,519 0 0
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Cassio Motta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 5 11 16 31.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 10 11 9.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 33 50 83 39.8% 55 89 144 38.2% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 13 22 40.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 18/20 of Cassio Motta's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Cassio Motta
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% 1991 10/10 2.1 2.0 64.3% 62.8% 43.5% 51.2% 30.6% 55.2% 33.2%
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% 1992 8/10 4.1 3.0 64.8% 68.3% 47.9% 63.3% 39.5% 61.2% 37.1%
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 18/269 3.0 2.4 64.5% 65.3% 45.4% 56.6% 34.5% 57.8% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Cassio Motta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 1979 1486 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 35.5% -1.26 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.65
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 1980 1440 106.6 — — — — — +18 — 16.7% -1.78 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.30
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1981 1452 118.5 — — — — — +22 — 33.3% -1.17 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1982 1541 132.3 — — — — — +34 — 45.2% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.01
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1983 1678 136.4 — — — — -92 -123 -42 42.9% -0.93 6–9 (40%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.25
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1984 1618 130.0 — — — — -81 +2 +67 45.1% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.17
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1985 1626 134.0 — — — — -100 +47 — 44.2% -0.62 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.73
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 1986 1668 121.5 — — — — -132 +54 — 49.0% -0.16 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.30
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 1987 1629 126.7 — — — — -92 +60 — 40.5% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 1988 1593 113.2 — — — — -18 +31 — 48.8% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.41
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 1989 1560 115.7 — — — — -7 +46 — 46.7% -0.29 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.16
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 1990 1538 112.9 — — — — +42 +29 — 35.6% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.44
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 1991 1476 100.3 -2.73 -2.51 0.741 44.1% +36 +93 — 22.7% -2.05 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.60
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 1992 1533 108.7 +0.71 -1.64 0.955 50.1% +8 +23 — 45.5% -0.36 1–1 1–1 — +0.41
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 1993 1520 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.03
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1740 130.1 -1.20 -2.12 0.828 46.8% -43 +21 +8 41.9% -0.65 37–55 (40%) 31–45 (41%) 96.4 +0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.