H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–3 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Gstaad fourth round 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 13, 2001* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #72 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 Francisco Clavet #57 Match data
Feb 26, 1998* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #18 6-1 7-6(5) Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
Aug 28, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Cedric Pioline #17 6-4 7-6(3) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #25 Match data
Sep 1, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Francisco Clavet #41 6-4 5-7 7-5 6-0 Cedric Pioline #56 Match data
Jul 20, 1991* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #49 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #100 Match data
May 31, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #51 6-2 6-3 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #105 Match data
Jun 22, 1990* Genova ATP 250 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #149 6-0 4-6 6-4 Francisco Clavet #180 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —