H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 3-3

Francisco Clavet and Emilio Sanchez are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1996 Australian Open first round 6-0 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Francisco Clavet #52 6-0 6-3 6-3 Emilio Sanchez #99 Match data
Aug 29, 1992* Schenectady ATP 250 QF Hard Emilio Sanchez #25 6-1 6-2 Francisco Clavet #24 Match data
Jul 11, 1992* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #24 7-5 7-5 Emilio Sanchez #19 Match data
Aug 24, 1991* Schenectady ATP 250 SF Hard Emilio Sanchez #15 7-5 6-1 Francisco Clavet #42 Match data
May 9, 1991* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #68 6-3 4-6 6-4 Emilio Sanchez #14 Match data
Nov 8, 1990* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Emilio Sanchez #8 5-7 6-2 7-6 Francisco Clavet #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,038 402 272 59.6% 0 1 0 0 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Emilio Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,545 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,668 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,841 0 3
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1988 39–19 67.2% #17 1,907 0 8
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,871 0 9
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,812 0 11
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,823 0 14
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1992 40–25 61.5% #21 1,783 0 15
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,686 0 15
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,628 0 15
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,587 0 15
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —