H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 3–0 on clay, while Fabrice Santoro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2002 Munich third round 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 2, 2002* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #87 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #22 Match data
Oct 12, 2000* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #35 6-4 2-6 6-4 Francisco Clavet #46 Match data
Aug 24, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #32 7-5 4-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #46 Match data
Jul 13, 1995* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #29 7-6(0) 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #36 Match data
Jul 11, 1992* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #24 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6