H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Franco Davin H2H: 1-1
Francisco Clavet and Franco Davin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1994 Palermo fourth round 5-7 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1994* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 5-7 6-2 7-6(8) | Franco Davin | Match data |
| May 13, 1994* | Coral Springs | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Franco Davin | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |