H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 0-2
Gaston Gaudio holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2001 Vina Del Mar quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-1 6-0 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-3 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |