H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-0

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1995 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #33 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-3 Gianluca Pozzi #93 Match data May 31, 1995* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.