H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 2-6

Goran Ivanisevic holds a 6–2 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 3-6 7-6(5).

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #19 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) Francisco Clavet #65 Match data
May 10, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #63 6-4 3-6 7-5 Goran Ivanisevic #62 Match data
Jan 21, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Francisco Clavet #39 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2 Goran Ivanisevic #70 Match data
Jan 7, 1999* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #12 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #30 Match data
Mar 1, 1996* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #6 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #42 Match data
Apr 27, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Goran Ivanisevic #7 3-6 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
Aug 5, 1994* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Goran Ivanisevic #2 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #91 Match data
Mar 8, 1990* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #38 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #209 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,124 561 316 64.0% 1 2 1 0 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Goran Ivanisevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #371 1,488 0 0
17 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0
18 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,921 0 1
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,922 0 2
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 57–18 76.0% #4 2,090 0 6
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,976 0 11
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,911 0 12
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 76–24 76.0% #4 2,001 0 17
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,866 0 20
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,873 0 21
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 11–21 34.4% #129 1,596 0 21
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,814 1 22
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,698 1 22
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,646 1 22
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,632 1 22
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8