H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Guillermo Perez-Roldan H2H: 1-0
Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Perez-Roldan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1996 Palermo third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1996* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-4 7-6(5) | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |