H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Guy Forget H2H: 1-2
Guy Forget holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guy Forget leads 1–0 on carpet, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1996 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-3 7-5 6-3 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1996* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Guy Forget | 6-3 6-4 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1995* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Guy Forget | 6-4 7-5 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Guy Forget | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |