H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Harel Levy H2H: 0-1
Harel Levy holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Harel Levy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Harel Levy won the 2001 Rome Masters third round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2001* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Harel Levy | 6-4 7-6(6) | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |