H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Hernan Gumy H2H: 3-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–1 lead over Hernan Gumy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Hernan Gumy
ARG Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Francisco Clavet #42 6-3 6-3 6-3 Hernan Gumy #88 Match data
Nov 4, 1995* Montevideo ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #38 7-6(3) 6-1 Hernan Gumy #64 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Valencia ATP 250 R16 Clay Hernan Gumy #83 6-4 6-2 Francisco Clavet #27 Match data
Sep 30, 1995* Palermo ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #37 6-0 6-3 Hernan Gumy #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Hernan Gumy #893 #39 948 1,766 108 121 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Hernan Gumy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 2–4 33.3% #135 1,493 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 25–17 59.5% #62 1,725 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 28–27 50.9% #42 1,717 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 22–27 44.9% #84 1,676 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 6–10 37.5% #109 1,640 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 14–16 46.7% #68 1,636 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 10–19 34.5% #118 1,568 0 1
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 1–1 50.0% #610 1,553 0 1
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —